President of India insults the Indian Flag!

There you have President of India, Ms. Pratibha Patil, not saluting the Indian flag in Mexico!!!!!

quoted from the TOI article " President Pratibha Patil gave protocol jitters as she inadvertently passed the flag at the ceremonial reception without bowing but quickly went back after her attention was drawn by the Mexican guard commander.
Patil, who was inspecting a guard of honour by the Mexican presidential guards, walked past the Mexican flag without realising that her Mexican counterpart Felipe Calderon had stopped to pay respect to his country’s flag.
The President then moved ahead without stopping before the Indian flag. “Madam President...,” the guard commander called out and Patil quickly retraced her steps and honoured the Tricolour."

such is the protocol consciousness of this (so called first) lady (puppet of the congress party) that the guard commander holding the Indian flag has to get her attention to do the honours to the Indian flag!!!

Where are all those weird desperate characters who kicked up a storm protesting against Sania Mirza??? (I pity that young sports person, for the photo angle was so very perfect to illustrate the disrespect to the national flag!)

Its high time we have this lady out of that post! She's not only insulting the post of a president of India, but also the Indian flag in a different country!!!


God bless India!

LOAN WAIVER SCAM AND ACCOUNTING GIMMICK MARKS BUDGET 2008-09;
KARNATAKA DRAWS A BLANK


The decision of the Finance Minister and the UPA government to waive Rs 60,000 crores of farm loans is an election year gimmick that smacks of populism. Rather than reform agriculture to make it more market driven, encourage research and development, the government has chosen the easy way of loan waiver scheme with intentions of capturing the votes of farming community in the coming Lok Sabha elections. Much needed farming reforms could have been enacted in the current budget that would have improved farm incomes, escalated agriculture growth to 5%, making agriculture more vibrant in the country.


Instead, the government has chosen a populist measure to waive loans of farmers and project that benefits might likely reach four crore poor farmers. But the data and experience of the last farm bailout portrays a completely different picture. The last loan waiver scheme of Rs 10,000 crore orchestrated by the then Agriculture Minster Mr. Devi Lal along with the Minister of Finance Mr. Janardhan Poojary was termed as a big failure by many farmers and research scholars, since it never reached the intended beneficiaries. Instead it became a grandiose distribution to political cronies and party workers of the party in power. Lok Partiran feels the result this time around will likely be the same, with political cronies and party workers likely to siphon off major portions of the funds, with very little of the benefit reaching the poor farmer.


Contrary to Finance Minister's claim in the parliament about sound fiscal shape of the country, India's fiscal deficit is one of the highest in the world and the government finances are the worst amongst the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. The budget presented by the Finance Minster in the parliament projects revenues of Rs 6,02,935 crores and revenue expenditure of Rs 6,58,119 crores projecting a total fiscal deficit of Rs 1,33,827 crores. These figures are a farce since it does not include subsides to Oil and Fertilizer companies. The government uses the Provident Fund account and Consolidated Fund of India (CFI) to make provision for these bonds, which is a terrible practice. While acknowledging this fact in the speech, Mr. Chidambaram again chooses convenience over good practice.


The overall debt position of the country is staggering and currently stands at more than 75% of the GDP and is a major source of weakness for finding much needed resources for development. The high debt ensures that interest payment makes up a major portion of the government expenditure. The current interest payment of Rs 1,90,807 crores indicates that Rs 60,500 per second is being added to the debt of the country. With sixth pay commission report due at the end of March 2008 and given that all political parties are in election mode, the government will be under enormous pressure to implement the recommendations. If the recommendation is anything like the last one – an increase of 30%, a massive burden will be imposed on both the central and state government finances that does not bode well for the debt position of the country.


With revenues buoyant, it would have been a sound fiscal move if the finance minister had indulged in the reforming of government subsidies. During the recent petrol and diesel price hike, even the left parties indicated that government should reform oil subsidies. Fertilizer subsidies could have been reformed with a start being made to direct the benefits directly to the farmers rather than route through state owned companies. With no respite in the rise in oil prices and urea prices in the world commodity markets, the government will have a very difficult time to contain the 2008-09 subsidy bill to the stated amount in the budget.


Reforms have also stagnated in the much needed infrastructure and power sectors of country. The Finance Minister has done very little in the budget to provide a fillip to these sectors. Roads need to be developed at a much faster pace than the current one and power shortages in critical industries are stifling growth in critical industries. An enactment of reforms in these sectors would have made people more optimistic about the Finance Minister's overall economic growth projection.


Finally, the Karnataka unit of Lok Paritran is appalled at the negligence of UPA government of the needs of the state in both the Union budget and Railway budget. Many measures were announced in the budget that focused on most unproductive states, while a very productive state like Karnataka is ignored and starved of central government resources in its quest for developmental. The Union government could have benefitted from the goodwill of people with a
sanction of an IIT in North Karnataka or housing scheme for Dakshina Karnataka. Lok Paritran if elected in the coming elections promises to fight these disparities and bring more development funds to fulfill the aspirations of the people of Karnataka.


Note: Karnataka Unit of Lok Paritran will make a detailed analysis of the Union Budget in the coming week.

















Government of India online Grievance Cell : http://darpg-grievance.nic.in/

==============================

====

Corrupt, useless and inefficient people are elected by the GOOD people

of the nation BY NOT VOTING !!

==================================

Lok Paritran, Karnataka State Unit

15, Wood Street, Ashok Nagar,

Bangalore - 560025

98455 97452, 98440 04439

www.lokparitran.org



Mahatma Gandhi said -



The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing

would suffice to solve most of the world's problems.



Be the change that you want to see.

Tata Nano: A curse for the upper classes or a blessing for the rest?

Its been quite some time since I wanted to write this article about the Tata Nano. I have had a bad feeling about traffic jams and pollution ever since the plans to have such a car were announced. And the negative feeling was there until the car was about to be released and I had a sort of realization that my views on the Nano were purely elitist.


The Tata Nano will lead to a lot of traffic problems and being a Bangalorean I would say we don't even need a Nano to choke up the existing potholed streets of Bangalore. Along with traffic congestion Nano is expected to bring in more air pollution and increased stress to people traveling on the roads.


Because its going to be the reason of the common man's pain, sneering at Nano sounds like an elitist attitude, an attitude that I would love to explain. Imagine that there are a group of people including me and you the reader as well. I happen to be the only one among the group to be having a car that costs Rs. 50 Lakhs. Applying the same elitist attitude, if my opinion is to ban all cars that cost less than Rs. 40 Lakhs so that the owners expensive cars get to zip around the city and also the city gets clean air, you know what kind of a hole people will call me :)


Thats why the attitude seems to be elitist. Probably the solution for the possible root of the problem lies in the government's response to the infrastructure woes of the country. Instead of pointing fingers at Nano - a car that has proved many cynics wrong, its a better idea to ask for better road infrastructure. And that is why I personally feel that the Nano is a blessing in disguise. The Indian system (the govt and the civil agencies) never wakes up until it gets a jolt and the jolt will be when Nano swarms the roads and cripples the complete system (although this looks a little far fetched, it is possible).


Widening the roads to any extent is not a good solution, especially when there is no concept of lanes in India and with the two and the three wheelers squeezing through the every available gap in the traffic its almost impossible to even dream of a disciplined traffic. Its surprising to see many people, especially the ones arguing against the Nano speak of implementing the congestion charge system similar to that of London while they are not thinking of the kind of amazing public transport present in this city. London has an excellent metro rail transport system and is very well complemented by the bus transport through out the city. With such an infrastructure it makes sense to have a congestion charge. But implementing it in any Indian city, the city would be better off by asking the businesses to shut down operations and move to some other country and people can swat flies sitting at home.


While Ratan Tata says that the idea of Nano is to provide a safer mode of transport to the Indian family of 4+ riding a 2-wheeler, Sunita Narain of the CSE claims that 2wheelers are a better option since they pollute less and is more inclined towards buses. Both sticking to their points, both are correct and sound noble in what they are saying. But IMHO a mass rapid transport system like a metro rail augmented with an excellent bus transport will do wonders to big cities in reducing the pollution levels, traffic density, travel time and convenience.

So a Nano may be perceived as a blessing or a curse, but the governments can do a lot towards having a good public transport system.

PS: I took the photos at the auto show :)